A history of philosophy in America, 1720-2000 by Bruce Kuklick

By Bruce Kuklick

Delivering a considerate, inclusive evaluation of yankee philosophical task from colonial divines to present-day teachers, Kuklick, a historian on the collage of Pennsylvania, defines philosophy expansively as "more or much less systematic writing concerning the aspect of our lifestyles, and our skill to appreciate the area of which we're a part." This large definition permits him to incorporate the philosophical points of writers usually missed in philosophy surveys, together with Jonathan Edwards, Benjamin Franklin and Ralph Waldo Emerson. Dense yet transparent, the e-book grounds its panoply of thinkers of their social context, fairly that of an evolving educational institution for which Kuklick has a few selection phrases ("constipated arrogance," in a single case). The background is damaged into 3 overlapping sessions: a religiously encouraged period (1720-1868), within which ministers, theologians and different amateurs shared equivalent prestige with specialist philosophers; the "Age of Pragmatism" (1859-1934), ruled via Peirce, James and Dewey; and the modern "professional" interval (1912-2000), during which American philosophy grew to become extra sophisticated and the world over prestigious, but in addition extra fragmented and distant from the general public. working issues comprise the "long circuitous march from a spiritual to a mundane imaginative and prescient of the universe," the long-running fit among idealism and materialism; and the common inattention of yankee philosophy to political and social issues. Admittedly selective, the booklet turns into an excessive amount of so on the finish: the final forty years are principally lowered to Kuhn and Rorty, skimming over virtually every thing else. but the booklet in general succeeds in picking out wide developments whereas spotlighting curious and important issues. Readers trying to find a grounded narrative of yankee thought's improvement and contexts will locate this e-book a correct and compelling consultant.

Show description

Read or Download A history of philosophy in America, 1720-2000 PDF

Best history & surveys books

Studies in Pessimism

CONTENTSOn the Sufferings of the WorldOn the conceit of ExistenceOn SuicideImmortality: A DialoguePsychological ObservationsOn EducationOf WomenOn NoiseA Few Parables

Malebranche's Theory of the Soul: A Cartesian Interpretation

This booklet bargains a provocative interpretation of the idea of the soul within the writings of the French Cartesian, Nicolas Malebranche (1638-1715). even though contemporary paintings on Malebranche's philosophy of brain has tended to stress his account of rules, Schmaltz focuses really on his rejection of Descartes' doctrine that the brain is best recognized than the physique.

The New Patricians: An Essay on Values and Consciousness

Patricians and plebians; the plebeianization of fact; the dwellers in different places; battlegrounds; victors; the recent patricians.

Additional resources for A history of philosophy in America, 1720-2000

Sample text

Learned religious men had ‘conversed with Books so much more than Men, as to be too much loaded with Vanity, to be good Politicians’. In this context the people who followed Edwards and who have been designated ‘philosophers’ by historians of philosophy and scholars of American intellectual life have played a peculiar role. Edwards most of all had made the core intellectual problems ones of meditation. From such reflection immediately flowed religious and moral commitments, but they were frequently tangential to communal concern and not based in a connectedness to political life.

Moreover, Edwards wanted to place all sinning in acts of will, distinct from any prior cause determining these acts. For New Haven, Edwards's argument against the selfdetermination of the will attacked the idea of taste. Self-determination was a physical characteristic causing willing, and Edwards showed this to be self-contradictory. Edwards's psychology assimilated affections and will, motive and choice. The will (choice) was as the greatest apparent good (motive). Motive was choice or volition.

The will had a competency to attend or not to attend to a presented motive and to act or not to act as it pleased. But Taylor used this notion of freedom to defend orthodox ideals. Taylor argued that people always sinned. He said they sinned ‘by nature’, meaning that at all times and in all circumstances they did and would sin. They also had a power to the contrary, a power not to sin. The identical people could have chosen differently in an identical situation. The physical or constitutional properties that belonged to individuals in the circumstances of their existence were the context of depravity.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.81 of 5 – based on 24 votes